掲示板 Forums - 2026 Kao Coin Contest - Rule preparation
Top > renshuu.org > Announcements
Page: 3 of 3
Getting the posts
Page: 3 of 3
Top > renshuu.org > Announcements
Requirements for all submissions:
1. The final Kao-coin image.
2. The kao-coin suggested name (in English and Japanese).
3. At least two sequential workflow proofs (of any planning/development/progress stages) that logically, clearly, and directly align with the final submitted image.
4. A short description of the materials, tools, techniques, and references used for the work.
5. An agreement stating that no part of the work (from idea generation to editing to formatting, etc.) was done with the use of Al, and which could be a checkbox to be marked before sending in each submission (so as to nix any possibility of alleging ignorance on the matter).
Additional requirements only for entries selected by Michael as potential finalists/winners (in order to reduce the task of having to do this for every submission), especially if flagged through the "Report Content” link:
6. Any number of additional sequential workflow proofs like those provided in requirement 3.
7. Visual proof of a random sampling (chosen at Michael's discretion) of the materials, tools, techniques, and/or references used to create the work as described in requirement 4.
8. A high-resolution (illustration or photo) file in a lossless format such as TIFF, PNG, or uncompressed JPEG.
9. The original work files (layered illustration or unedited photo) with complete metadata—for automatic elimination of any entries with conflicting, lacking or incomplete information—to compare with requirement 8.
All participants can prepare requirements 6–9 in advance in case they are selected as potential finalists/winners to avoid not being able to meet these requirements if asked to do so.
I feel like that's all a bit overkill and would just discourage a lot of genuine artists from participating at all. This isn't a final exam for an art class. Honestly I feel like requirement #9 would be sufficient enough as proof for a finalist, even a combination of 8 and 9 would be good.
I think a video of the drawing process should be part of the submission. It's not hard for someone working physically to set up a camera at an angle. And AI generated videos are much harder to pass as real than images. Additionally, perhaps add something in the video that would be hard to fake by AI, like scrolling through or showing a large piece of text, as letters usually get deformed in AI generated content. If there's some AI that can make a realistic video in this way and only a few poeple have access to it, I'd say to simply accept the possibility of a few AI generated images making their way, as long as one can demonstrate that it would be only a small part and no user will be able to tell. Maybe make the video proof public too and have a simple reporting system, in case Michael misses something while checking the video.
This might be similar to what ダニナド said but maybe
A. For physical works, video of the artist wobbling the paper around, spinning it around, flipping it back and forth, something like that seems like it'd be hard for AI to recreate (especially the flipping from back to front). Although I could see poor quality videos seeming like AI even if it isn't.
B. For digital works, assuming the user has multiple layers, screen recording (or a camera pointed at their screen) of them drawing a line through the layers in such a way an AI could not create. For example, lets say the shading and flat color are their own layers, if the artist made a layer between those two and drew some wavy lines through it (temporarily), it'd likely be difficult for an AI to recreate in any accurate way. Issue with this could be that some artists may not actually do layers which could lead to that verification process being impossible.
B2. Reordering the layers temporarily, like juggling them around. This might even work for the layer minimalist artists since I think even most artists choose to make at least 1 layer for lineart and 1 layer for color. Shoot, maybe even move the layers around a little bit individually.
I'm essentially saying we should get silly with it to prove its authenticity.